La fin de lhomme rouge alexievich biographies

That would have been enough for me. Our little Olga got sick, she was just four months old. In the hospital I kept pacing and pacing with her back and forth through the corridors. And if I managed to get her to sleep for even half an hour, what do you think I would do? Even though I was beyond exhausted…Guess! I always had The Gulag Archipelago under my arm, and I would immediately open it and start reading.

Books replaced life for us. They la fin de lhomme rouge alexievich biographies our whole world. Our souls strain and suffer, but not much gets done — there is no strength left over after all that ardor. Nothing ever gets done. The mysterious Russian soul…. Everyone wants to understand it. We like to have a chat in the kitchen, read a book. There are no Stoltzes.

The industrious, savvy Stoltzes are despised for chopping down the beloved birch grove, the cherry orchard. Demystifying the eternal obsession with the enigmatic Russian soul or not, reading Second-Hand Time is probably the closest I ever got to it. The photographs are from the Belgian photographer and Magnum member Bieke Depoorter.

One of the best books I've ever read. A book that penetrates the soul of my being and explains me to myself. An Autobiographical Review this book is my autobiography, and it speaks my heart better than I ever have articulated it myself; many details below are personal, but they are also in the book, and what the book is about. Seventy-plus years in the Marxist-Leninist laboratory gave rise to a new man: Homo sovieticus.

We have a special relationship with death. How much can we value human life when we know that not long ago people had died by the millions? All of us come from the land of the gulag and harrowing war. Collectivization, dekulakization, mass deportations … This was socialism, but it was also just everyday life. My experience has straddled both, with the transition from the former to the latter a violently, radically sudden rupture at a young and impressionable age.

One day, I was accompanying my mom on her daily errands through Bucharest's dilapidated landscape of empty government-run stores and identically dreary blocks of state-issued of course tenement housing, waiting in the 4th line of the day, for an extra handful of eggs she would receive for bringing me along. Then excitedly heading home for the 30 minutes of kids' TV programming offered daily of 2 or 3 hours total broadcasting, on one channel.

All the while, being tailed by the Securitate my father had defected and been sentenced in absentiaso we lived under constant surveillance. Seemingly the next day - well. You've heard the stories of immigrant shock: the vast highways, insanely stocked supermarkets supermarkets! And people who nonchalantly wander through it all, completely nonplussed at the fact that there are mounds of bananas everywhere and people aren't shoving each other out of the way to get to them.

Ok so I had had ONE banana my entire childhood - smuggled into the country illegally of course. To this day I'm still Of course the stuff is only the beginning, only the surface layer that one immediately notices upon stepping off a plane into the Land of Abundance and Freedom for the first time. Everything down up? Our trust. But who could say that nothing has changed?

Did you forget that? And they would be grateful. Have you forgotten? No one stands in line for sugar and soap anymore. No - you do not forget: childhood baths taken in a little pot in the middle of the living room, with mom pouring hot water heated on the stove. You do not forget relatives from the country bringing you the only meat you would eat that month - to this day, you do not scoff at pig feet or intestines or whatever items are too unfashionable in your new environment.

You do not forget Sandy Bellthe only cartoon on TV for years, 30 minutes every weekday night. Because you do not forget these things, because you can never quite look at bananas in the same way as your new neighbors or new generations, because you never do overcome the cynicism and bravado you learned in diapers torn from old sheets and laundered with coarse hand-made soap, because you do not forget, you don't ever fully adapt to Capitalism.

Secondhand Time: The Last of the Soviets is an oral history of this transition from full-blown privation, closed-off-to-the-world communism to a more or less capitalistic society. Told, as always with Alexievich's work, through a complex tapestry of voices, collected over many hundreds of hours worth of interviews, The Last of the Soviets is an explosively profound rendering of the collective memory of the region, before-during-after revolution.

The differences are stark. While I wanted to throw The Fox out the window many a times I settled for calling my mother to vent in frustrationAlexievich's work is like salve to my soul, and everything I remember about the people and spirit of the region. For me, it was an overnight affair: one day I'm in Romania, the next, in the United States. This book goes a long way into filling in the gaps from my absence.

I received a copy from the publisher through Netgalley. Then I bought the book anyway when it came out - no question I need a physical copy to mark up and peruse like a personal bible. Obviously, all opinions are very much my own. People shaped by a great failed experiment. Fathers and children had very different answers. The end of the Cold War and the break-up of the Soviet Union that became official in was a life-changing event, reshaping the course of politics and power quite drastically.

And yes, it can be viewed as a win for Western values or democracy or freedom, or the clear sign that totalitarianism has within it the seeds of its own destruction. But however you look at it, it is also a life-changing cataclysm for those caught in the gears of shifting political and economic machinethose whose value system and beliefs were suddenly changed, those who were not shrewd enough or ruthless enough or just lucky enough to rise to the top and ended up just hanging on and trying to keep their heads above water.

They were overcome with unspeakable horror. How were we supposed to live with this? Many greeted the truth as an enemy. And freedom as well. Is it everything we hoped it would be? We were prepared to die for our ideals. To prove ourselves in battle. Instead, we ushered in a Chekhovian life. Without any history. Without any values except for the value of human life—life in general.

Now we have new dreams: building a house, buying a decent car, planting gooseberries…Freedom turned out to mean the rehabilitation of bourgeois existence, which has traditionally been suppressed in Russia. The freedom of Her Highness Consumption. But what happened to many of them is exactly what one would expect. The economically devastating s were not for the idealists — they were fertile ground for future oligarchs and racketeers and various hangers-on to those.

And you, suddenly penniless intellectuals — you were free now, once the places you worked for went bankrupt and insane price inflation hit, vaporizing all your savings in days and teaching you to pay millions of now useless money for bread and matches and rope and soap, as I remember adults bleakly semi-joking around that time and reducing you to try and peddle what remained of your valuables in street markets.

The strong, with their iron biceps, are the ones who survive. Others even find it disgusting. I reminisced alongside my protagonists. They really wanted blue jeans, VCRs, and most of all, cars. Nice clothes and good food. And that may give just a bit of insight into why things are the way they are in the post-Soviet Russia. She grew onions in egg cartons on the windowsill, fermented huge pots of cabbage.

Stockpiled sugar and butter. Our storage cabinets were glutted with grains. Pearl barley.

La fin de lhomme rouge alexievich biographies: Armée d'un magnétophone et d'un stylo,

We had no reason to love the Soviet regime. This book is full of narratives of people who, despite coming from the families that suffered through the Stalin regime or even experienced the repressions and the camps firsthand still continued to romanticize and cling to the idea of worshipping what they saw as a great state despite all the wrongness and all the devastation state terror caused.

And I feel torn between feeling really bad for them after their entire world and their values system crumbled overnight and the horrible wild capitalism took over — and feeling sad how desperately they were clutching to the system that destroyed them and their parents. People would visit it like they were going to a museum. Or to the library.

Boys and girls stumbled around with crazed expressions, like zombies among the stalls… […] Millions of new little boxes and jars. Educated, intelligent adults saved boxes and napkins from there and would proudly show them off to guests. Regardless of how their lives were, it seemed that many found meaning in belonging to something they viewed as greater than themselves.

A sense of self-worth by association, perhaps? Even if lives were poor and miserable, being a part of an entity feared and respected, as people chose to interpret that fear brought a feeling of security and importance. And that the feeling that proved to be hard to let go of, and the sense that they missed once the former USSR was no longer considered a formidable world power.

No one searched for rational proof that any of this would really happen. There was none. What did we need it for? We believed in it with our las fin de lhomme rouge alexievich biographies, not our reason. At the district polling stations, we voted with our hearts, as well. No one told us what exactly we were supposed to do: We were free now and that was that.

The story of those who lived through tragedies and internalized either the glorification of the system that was based on humiliation and subjugation or the deep fear of the consequences of disobedience; those who despite everything sincerely believed in heroic idealism and romanticism of placing those ideals above everything else.

And pain when these came crushing against new reality. A difficult book to read, but the one that really hits a particular nerve. Pero he de advertir que este un libro exige del lector un triple compromiso de confianza. Olive Fellows abookolive. Check out my video on Booktube! Paul Bryant. Transcriptions of dozens of interviews with dozens of Russians, all ex-Soviet citizens, about what it was like to live through the collapse of the USSR, the defeat of communism and the rise of the gangster oligarchy.

There are many sincere communists in these pages who wring their hands in different ways, some denouncing that perfect idiot Gorbachev, some that ridiculous stooge Yeltsin, there were enemies of the unique Soviet way of life every way you looked. Yes, they say, it was all true about the empty shelves and the shortages and the cramped lives, but in those days they were doing something unique, they had this dream, it badly needed to be reformed, but instead the crazy hotheads threw the whole project in the bin and prostrated themselves before the mighty capitalists.

Over and over again. I was defending socialism, but some other kind, not the Soviet kind Page One of my girlfriends got into such a big fight about Lenin with her son and daughter-in-law, she kicked them out. Page There was a mountain of red flags and pennants. Party and Komsomol membership cards. And Soviet war medals! Orders of Lenin and the Red Banner.

For Valor! Page I read an essay by a so-called democrat who said that the war generation… which is to say, us…was in power too long. We won the war, rebuilt the country, and after that we should have left because we had no conception of how to live in peacetime. Educated, intelligent adults saved boxes and napkins from there and would proudly show them off to their guests.

You can see how it is. So for me there were a couple of big problems. First is that this huge book seemed like raw material gathered for another book. And it was the other book I was wanting to read. For me, there was simply too much of the same kind of woeful sorrowful tale of bitter regret. They have uniform covers for all their books and they are the world's dullest.

Wow, okay, we get you're really a Serious company, but give us readers a break, please. Metodi Markov. The book "Secondhand-Zeit" was written by Svetlana Alexiewitsch in She reports on life la fin de lhomme rouge alexievich biographies the Cold War in Russia. The Country is in a phase in which the Country has to find itself again. Svetlana Alexiewitsch Nobel Prize Laureate İnterviewed people from different Social strata of the Nomenklatura, as well as numerous citizens of the former Soviet Union of different age groups, between the Years and The emancipated improvement in life conditions did not simply occur.

Important in advance: This book requires endurance and readiness to read about others' suffering. Author 2 books 4, followers. Maziyar Yf. Fatma Al Zahraa Yehia. This is a brilliant book about modern Russian history. The author interviewed dozens of Russian citizens and documented their stories about life in the Soviet Union, and how life has been since it fell.

There is a helpful timeline at the front of the book, detailing events after Stalin's death inup to the rise of Putin and to armed conflicts in the Ukraine in I started reading this late last summer, before we knew that Russia had interfered with America's presidential election. Even then, this book seemed so relevant to our times.

I'm a big believer in context, and trying to understand how and why things got to their current state. If you want to try and understand Vladimir Putin, you should read Secondhand Time. Highly recommended. Meaningful Passage "Why does this book contain so many stories of suicides instead of more typical Soviets with typically Soviet life stories?

When it comes down to it, people end their lives for love, from fear of old age, or just out of curiosity, from a desire to come face to face with the mystery of death. I sought out people who had been permanently bound to the Soviet idea, letting it penetrate them so deeply that there was no separating them: The state had become their entire cosmos, blocking out everything else, even their own lives.

They couldn't just walk away from History, leaving it all behind and learning to live without it Today, people just want to live their lives, they don't need some great Idea. This is entirely new for Russia; it's unprecedented in Russian literature. At heart, we're built for war. We were always either fighting or preparing to fight. We've never known anything else -- hence our wartime psychology.

Even in civilian life, everything was always militarized. I was eleven or perhaps twelve years old when I learned that ignorance is no excuse for anything. That revelation completely changed the way I viewed the world. I ran to my parents, separately, I remember, my eyes wide. You can die as a result of ignorance or you can participate in something evil as a result of ignorance.

As I remember it, my parents did not say anything. There is much I would think as a result of my eleven-year-old coming to me with such a revelation, and I am not sure I would know what to respond, either. But it was a big moment, and it came from reading a novel. Now I wonder which novel gave me such an insight, but I cannot remember.

I was an ordinary schoolgirl, with no special access to literature. I read too much, my sisters said, and most of them were bodice-rippers… This book reminds me of that moment of realization. The insights into what man is and how he responds to national, political, and personal trauma come fast and hard in this work. They had an excuse, the lack of reliable, comprehensive news coverage one of them, but it would not save them from their future nor their past.

There is simply nothing to compare with this fabulous reconstruction of the lives of people under communism and after. From the sounds of some voices, it succeeded on every measure. But if nature can be changed, we question again what "nature" is. Naomi Klein tells us man is not hopelessly greedy but it is hard to see that when greed is rewarded and protected.

The Soviet Union, Russia, has gone through enormous social upheaval in the last one hundred years, and Alexievich manages to give us a window through which we can begin to see what happened to people. Because governance the world over has many similarities, constraints, and imperatives, everyone who can read should see how governance actually plays out, no matter what we believe.

These people are not so different from us. They are just people after all. All that they did, all they experienced, can happen to us. It is necessary to be vigilant, to be aware, so that we do not, inadvertently, give evil a chance to thrive. Alexievich has taken memory and made literature. For me, it will be one of the most meaningful books I have ever come across.

I want to point everyone to Ilse's review of this title. She does such a lovely job of articulating what Alexievich managed to accomplish. Interviews with those who live in Russia from Stalin to I believe Was just too much for me to read in one sitting, so I read a few each night before bed. A very worthy book, important to hear from those who actually lived thought these times.

La fin de lhomme rouge alexievich biographies: Secondhand Time: The Last of

Some of this was brutal, the gulags, Siberia, the fear but many also missed the days of Communism, missed life under Stalin, saw him as a hero. So, we get a mixed view of life under Communism and life after intended. Very interesting. Well presented, pertinent responses, the author did a good job assembling these pieces, interviews.

Russia has such a long and complicated history, so much in their way of life not easy to understand but books like these open our eyes to the way ordinary Russians view their past and present as well as the turmoil, political and economical. Glad I read this. Who cares if you have read all Hegel? First, its cover should be extremely charming, second, it should be bulky, and third, it must be historical.

A world book fair was organized in my city last month, I rigorously followed the rule and the book that got qualified for me this year was this one. Coincidently I found a great amount of similarity in the writing of these three writers. All three have written their historical accounts in a very alluring and captivating manner, these writers are able to give you a sort of beguiling feel of reading a non-fiction, very much like a fiction, and at the same time they perfect your understanding of history.

Coming back to this book of Svetlana Alexivitch, This book unleashed the knots of my mind. My understanding about the real life of Soviet people increased multi-fold and I felt a peculiar sort of connectivity with the people there. We all are same in our desires and limitations; it does not matter which part of globe, we reside in, and which kind of political system we are inflicted upon, by the authorities.

Our country was suddenly covered in banks and billboards. A new breed of goods appeared. Our old soviet stuff was grey, ascetic, and looked as if it had been manufactured in war time. This book is written in hybrid style by the author; mixture of a kind of reportage and a kind of documentary on paper. She is a lifelong journalist and her writing has all those flavors of journalism.

Records …Interviews…Facts Quest for truth! She has recorded the voices of housewives, common men, Gulag survivors and ex- communist post holders. Though she has not put forward her own opinion for the sake of conveying a message of a writer in this book, still she has her writerly craft giving voice to the unknown and lost sentiments. It is said that Alexivitch is anything but a simple recorder of found voices.

She has a writerly voice of her own with great style and authority. She has recorded some very agonizing and torturous accounts and stories of people in their own words from these periods. Few of us remained unchanged. Descent people seem to have disappeared. Now its teeth and elbow everywhere…. I am very happy that I read this book.

This is an awesome and phenomenal work by this Nobel Laureate! This is such a quotable book. Not because of anti-communist rhetoric, or -propaganda, since the book was originally written in Russian for a widely diverse Russian population. Secondhand Time: The Last of the Soviets is an honest internal dialogue that is taking place, once again, in the kitchens where people gathered to eat, drink, talk, and sleep on the large masonry stoves.

Their only little patch of freedom. Through a journalist, touring the country for several years, conversations are brought together in one place where people can read the book and finally talk about their experiences again in the kitchens, the only place where souls could intimately communicate with each other, as always. As the author said about the idea of this book: history is about facts, it never includes the emotions behind these events don't we all know that.

And this tale discusses the feelings of a nation who got ripped from their past and shoved into a future they simply did not understand and could not handle. Where capitalism developed over several centuries in other countries, Russia had to do it in three years. The people are trying to make sense of their new freedom. For them the future was as terrifying as their lives under Stalin.

The KGB were the iron fist, the red-hot iron, the iron rod Those boys got everyone in line. How can anyone get by without a flogging by the whip? Everyone needed it. What happened to a proud country that always regarded themselves as the best? Now we're la fin de lhomme rouge alexievich biographies but peddlers and looters Some people condone, and others condemn the initial start of 70 years of darkness.

For some it brought safety, for others sacrifices beyond imagining. Some see him as a tragic figure, others call him a sovok. The drums were beating, the banners flying, our hearts leaping out of our chests. They hoped their lives died with them so that their families did not have to suffer the consequences. How profound is that thought for all of us?!

The actions of the fathers visited upon the children. How true! How dire it turned out for many innocent Russian citizens. After"Pathos raged, but the knowledge that utopia should not be attempted in real life was already ingrained in us. New farmers quickly had to adapt to new disciplines. Suddenly time was money. Nobody dared to steal or nap!

The workers were in the hands of new 'fascists'. The discovery of money was like a one night stand. The citizens quickly fell in, and then hastily, out of love with it. Apart from being a collection of the real emotions behind a country's history, this book is also a showcase of the beautiful prose ingrained in the minds and souls of a people who suffered the ordeal of emotional and physical slavery for decades, but doing so with pride and conviction.

In moments of hope, one father, who survived Siberian camps believed that all it would take to enjoy life in the new Russia, was to man up--the worst is yet to come. All you needed to survive in life was bread, unions and soap. That's it. There were those who wanted to forget the past. And those who couldn't. Horrific stories, heartbreaking memories came pouring out, crisscrossing the tale of new beginnings in the over-abundance of consumerism for the fortunate.

Those who did not make it after the fall of Communism, were left to rot and kill themselves. Billionaire and millionaire Communists, with palaces in Moscow, France, and places like the Greek Islands, kept themselves drowned and locked up in their new utopia of wealth and extravagance, while the rest of the unfortunate population lost themselves in the forgotten greatness of intellect and equality for all.

Stalin very soon became an icon of excellence again. A kind of God that should be resurrected to save the people from the hooligans and thieves who captured state assets, looting all available resources, leaving the once great nation's loyalist embittered and angry. Between three generations, collective memories of each generation became three different countries.

The one as foreign as the other in the divided families. The only element that remained, was fear. It was even described as a form of love everyone understood. So yes, I was so embedded in this detailed, descriptive prose, I was unwilling to come up for air. Svetlana Alexievich won several international awards, including the Nobel Prize in Literature, for the genre she created herself which is described as her polyphonic monument to suffering and courage.

In this book's case, since I have not read this author before, it is a brutal voice in the gentle hands of a woman. It is an invitation to walk in the shoes of other people and read the alternative history that should be told and documented. Isn't that the reason why we also love historical fiction so much? This book is the road less traveled into Russia, for most of us.

It was a shocking, unsettling, sad read. Arduous, often repetitive. I did not read every single word, skip-read pages of horror, but read most of it. I simply could not stomach some of the revolting details. Yet, I caught the gist of the page book which was profound, honest and hopeful. Not unique at all. There are many voices confirming this tale in different media forms.

But this one is necessary for those who want to know it all bundled into one book. Just sit back and listen Read this most heartfelt, touching review of this unforgettable book. Ioana's review. Way back in the early 90s, I remember my parents entertaining some young Russians, who were work colleagues of my maths professor father. I remember being quite struck by how little respect they had for Mikhail Gorbachev, who was still being hailed as a visionary leader in the West.

This monumental book goes some way to explaining these feelings, along with many other aspects of life in the former Soviet Union, both before and in the 20 years after the fall of the Communist regime. Alexievich is a Nobel prize winning oral historian from Belarus who collects the testimony of ordinary people throughout the former Union. One word which occurs with great frequency is sovok, a disparaging slang term used to describe those who retained nostalgic feelings about the Soviet regime.

The book is full of heartbreaking personal stories, that demonstrate how little control many people had over their lives, as their savings became worthless and many of the country's assets were plundered by those who were stronger and more ruthless. There are also many harsh accounts of the barbarity with which nationalism and ethnic conflicts arose in many parts of the former union.

Alexievich largely keeps her own perspective silent - her mastery is in the way she weaves a complex tapestry of so many disparate individual voices. She was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature Seconhand time: The Last of the Soviets traces the emotional history of the Soviet and post-Soviet individual through carefully constructed collages of interviews.

Svetlana Alexievich weaves a rich catholog of Russian voices telling their stories of Worshipped Russian leaders, of love and death, hard and sad times, and how people try to embrace the challenges given to them in life. The stories are woven from hundreds of interviews, an oral history that has the voices and passion of real people who have suffered at the hands of their leaders.

There is raw emotion and sadness in the stories and yet because you lean very little about these people you form no connection which them which was fine for about the first pages and then I became numb to the stories and I began to find the writing repetitive. While the stories appear to be real and simplistic I did find it quite depressing and its the sort of book better read as a side read.

The book is is a very interesting account of Russians coming to terms with the fall of the Soviet Union and how their lives are affected. This is not a light read and I did find it difficult to finish as it lost its initial appeal after the first pages and I while I finished it I did struggle through the last few chapters. Kitchen table ideology.

To read that the Soviet Union ended and that the decades old experiment in communism had failed is a study in ambiguity and understatement. What Alexievich provides, by way of multiple interviews from various perspectives, is a human face to this paradigm shift: not from the historians, journalists and political scientists, but from the viewpoint of a kitchen table, where families eat, children do homework, housewives gather to discuss not just current events but the price of goods and where can be found needed supplies.

It was this perspective that will stay with me after reading this remarkable work, the voice of ordinary people, just trying to live their lives and being in the eye of a historical, political storm. Not about great and calamitous governmental las fin de lhomme rouge alexievich biographies, but how the price of food went up or down and how and where clothes and fabric could be bought and the sacrifice to clothe, feed and raise children.

And to be fair, Alexievich describes a multitude of former communists, many who did not welcome the reforms but instead found in the old revolution a comforting blanket to wrap about themselves — they admit to poverty and deprivation but miss the community and singleness of purpose. Others wanted reforms but did not want all out capitalism.

Most wanted political change but were unsure what that would mean and were ill prepared for what the loud and gaudy West had to offer. For many it was freedom to live their lives as they saw fit, but for others it was the anxious freedom to want and the freedom to do without. Another recurrent theme was the old stolid communist who had been left behind with revolutionary dreams unfulfilled and with a pittance of a pension that could no longer support them.

The younger generation wanted more, and the hopes and promises of the long-ago revolution were not enough to satisfy the needs of people who had a glimpse of a better life. Alexievich spends some time with the civil rights abuses and the suppression of free speech that went on in the authoritarian regimes but always at the forefront of her narrative was the economic and human costs of the failed ideology.

This was not a page turner, I had to take my time reading. It can be very difficult to grasp the perspectives that she shared; these were not Americans who just needed to wash off the red of communism, her voices were frequently damaged people who wanted change but who did not necessarily desire the change they got. This was also about a people who missed the shared communal spirit; they might have been poor, but everyone else was poor also and there was a sense of belonging, that the shared sacrifices were for a better country — and that loss, even considering social and political improvements in their lives, was still a haunting forfeiture whose absence resulted in grief and complicated feelings.

An important work and one that should be read and discussed.

La fin de lhomme rouge alexievich biographies: Armée d'un magnétophone et d'un

Her review is the best I've read on Goodreads for any book ; a pure concerto of the personally poetic and the pellucidly profound [ Ioana's review ]. After reading it, I immediately got this. I must add here a personal note that one of my first crushes and initial recognition of the dry mouth, flushness of my face and tingling near my stomach was at 11 years old watching Romanian gold-medal gymnast Nadia Comaneci, then 13, competing in the Summer Olympics.

Excuse me, my 11 year old self needs a glass of water. Okay, Thanks for your patience. Secondhand Time: The Last of the Soviets was a brass-knuckles punch to my arrogant American belief that all Russians and Eastern Europeans welcomed capitalism with open arms. This is the incinerating oral history of the the ursine Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc fromthe time of perestroika, until It was published originally inbut translated into English only this year.

The oral history is split into two different periods: first from to as the transition from Communism was occurring, and fromwhich shows, I think, the reverberations of the transformation and transition. This book hits full-throttle from page 1 and is unrelenting until the last page. I've never read anything like it.

La fin de lhomme rouge alexievich biographies: About the Author. Née en

It's a raw raising of the Iron Curtain to stories of the violence, the attempt to overthrow Gorbachev by the old line communists, suicides and rapes. The first part was taken down while some of the old communists who lived under Stalin were still alive and includes a few jarring jeremiads to solidarity, Lenin, Stalin, and the communistic ideal of heaven on earth.

An example of one of the old Bolsheviks : "You have your own utopia. The market. Market heaven. The market will make everyone happy. Pure fantasy. The streets are filled with gangsters in magenta blazers, gold chains hanging down to their bellies. Caricatures of capitalism. A farce. Instead of the dictatorship or the proletariat, it's the law of the jungle.

Une saga moscovite Vassili Axionov 4. Critiques, Analyses et Avis Voir plus Ajouter une critique. Signaler ce contenu Page de la critique. Edifiant, magnifique! Vivre en Russie. Et ce n'est pas grave. Personne ne sait quoi en faire ». L'esprit d'entreprise, l'accumulation ne faisait pas partie de leur logiciel. Mais la fin de l'U. Qu'en pensez-vous?

Elle se revendique du « roman de voix » de Ales Adamovitch. Un Livre d'Histoire. Citations et extraits Voir plus Ajouter une citation. Signaler ce contenu Page de la citation. Nous avons grandi parmi des bourreaux et des victimes Pour nous, c'est normal de vivre ensemble. Graisser la patte, verser des pots-de-vin, des bakchichs Comme dans les camps Maintenant nous avons des victimes de l'effondrement d'un empire.

De sa faillite Des scientifiques Il est plein de haine. Ce ne sont pas les volontaires qui manquent. Elles se coltinent leur maison, leurs enfants, leurs vieux parents. Leurs maris Et le pays tout entier. Au fond nous sommes des guerriers. Nos coeurs bondissaient dans nos poitrines